Search for: All records

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems can effectively address user queries by leveraging indexed document corpora to retrieve the relevant contexts. Ranking techniques have been adopted in RAG systems to sort the retrieved contexts by their relevance to the query so that users can select the most useful contexts for their downstream tasks. While many existing ranking methods rely on the similarity between the embedding vectors of the context and query to measure relevance, it is important to note that similarity does not equate to relevance in all scenarios. Some ranking methods use large language models (LLMs) to rank the contexts by putting the query and the candidate contexts in the prompt and asking LLM about their relevance. The scalability of those methods is contingent on the number of candidate contexts and the context window of those LLMs. Also, those methods require fine-tuning the LLMs, which can be computationally expensive and require domain-related data. In this work, we propose a scalable ranking framework that does not involve LLM training. Our framework uses an off-the-shelf LLM to hypothesize the user's query based on the retrieved contexts and ranks the contexts based on the similarity between the hypothesized queries and the user query. Our framework is efficient at inference time and is compatible with many other context retrieval and ranking techniques. Experimental results show that our method improves the ranking performance of retrieval systems in multiple benchmarks.